VC Fund Secondary: Buy the Winning Ticket at Halftime (at Half Price)

Skip the J-curve. Faster Growth, Shorter Liquidity.

Venture capital isn’t for everyone. Most startups fail, and most investments return zero. Many VC funds don’t make any distributions in the first 5 years, and most of them take 10-15 years or longer to fully exit. The lack of predictability and a long period of illiquidity makes venture capital a challenging asset class for all but the most patient of investors.

That said, top VC funds can perform far better than the rest of the market, and the best tech companies can turn into unicorns that generate 20X, 50X, or sometimes even 100X returns.

If only there was a way to skip ahead five or more years and invest in just the VC funds that are doing well, wouldn’t that be great?



Skip The J-Curve: Buy VC Funds After They’re Already Winning


What if you could arrive at the game at halftime and bet on the team that was already ahead by 10 points? And what if you could buy that winning ticket at a discount? Imagine your friend called you up from the stadium and said, “Hey, I’ve got an emergency and have to leave the game right now – do you want my seat for half-price? I’ve also got a bet on the team that’s winning, but you have to stay until the end of the game to collect.”

Sound too good to be true? Well, it really does happen. Some fans who come to the game might need to leave early. Some investors in VC funds want liquidity before the fund term is over. Fans who leave at halftime will sell their seats at a discount. Investors who want early liquidity will take a haircut on returns in order to cash out immediately. This is the benefit of buying secondary in a VC fund after the first five years, aka “Skip the J-Curve.”




Why VC Secondary? No “Blind Pool,” Faster Growth, Shorter Liquidity


Beyond upfront discounts of 25-50%, there are other key benefits to investing in VC fund secondary.


Because portfolio companies are already established and growing, buyers have a better sense of what they’re getting for their money – they aren’t investing in a “blind pool” of unknown future assets. After five years or more, successful VC funds should have established winners at Series B or C and perhaps even early exits and distributions. Seeing the first few years of performance in the rearview mirror provides insight into how well the fund manager is doing and how well the fund is likely to perform in the future. Again, it’s kind of like checking the score at halftime to see which team is ahead.


Because funds over 5 years old may already be making distributions, investor capital is returned more quickly, perhaps in just a few years. And because Series B and C winners are scaling up fast (often 50-100% or more annually), their growth rates tend to drive the portfolio. As these companies become unicorns, typically one large outcome will dominate the portfolio and drive a power-law distribution of returns.


Finally, the typical 10-15 year holding period for a traditional VC fund can be cut in half when buying fund secondary. This reduces the long illiquidity period of venture capital substantially, making it more competitive with other alternative asset classes such as private equity, private credit, hedge funds, or real estate.




Fund Secondary vs. Company Secondary


Sometimes people may confuse buying fund secondary (partnership interests in a fund) with direct or company secondary (common or preferred stock in a company). Both types of transactions may be called “secondary;” however, they are quite different. Fund secondary is like buying a slice of the entire portfolio, rather than a stake in a single company.

Company secondary (also known as “direct secondary”) has become a popular strategy for retail investors to buy unicorns and get access to venture capital – although due to increased competition, there may be fewer bargains to be found than in the past. Because fund secondary is less common, and because there are often more sellers than buyers, significant discounts are typically available to those investors willing to buy a slice of the portfolio.

Another difference is that because funds contain many assets rather than just one company, they are usually more complicated to evaluate and diligence (especially for investors less familiar with venture capital). And because there are multiple companies in a portfolio, fund secondary is usually more diversified than direct secondary in a single company.




Seller Motivations: Strategy, Tragedy, Liquidity, Victory.


VC secondary opportunities arise because the seller is motivated, not necessarily because the asset is distressed. Seller motivations may include family offices liquidating positions due to a change in member status; corporates with a new exec making changes in strategy; and fund managers who want to realize gains to demonstrate performance or to make distributions. There may be a wide variety of reasons driving the need for liquidity, including but not limited to distress or downturns.



Conclusion

VC fund secondary combines the growth of venture capital with a shorter liquidity timeframe and the opportunity to invest at significant discounts. Buying fund secondary after the first five years of performance allows investors to pick funds that are already winning and return capital more quickly. Market downturns increase the need for liquidity, and since there aren’t many buyers for fund secondary, the discounts can be substantial.

Sometimes people really do need to leave at halftime. For those willing to stay until the end of the game, excellent seats are available.


Special Thanks to Our Contributor


Dave McClure

Founding Partner, Practical Venture Capital

dave@practicalvc.com


Stephanie M. Shorter, PhD

Investor Relations, Practical Venture Capital

steph@practicalvc.com



Practical Venture Capital is a Silicon Valley VC secondary firm that buys fund interests from LPs and GPs in top-performing VC funds. PVC was founded by Dave McClure, a 25-year Silicon Valley veteran entrepreneur and VC (500 Startups, Founders Fund, PayPal) who have invested in 15+ unicorns and 5 IPOs at the Seed or Series A stage. Dave was listed in the Midas List of top 100 Global VCs by Forbes in both 2016 and 2017. General Partner Aman Verjee (CFA, JD) has 15+ years of experience working and investing in tech startups and has led finance and operations for Fortune 500 companies (eBay, PayPal) and growth companies such as Sonos (NASDAQ: SONO). Aman has led > $1B in financings as CFO. Dave and Aman have invested in over 40 VC funds and hundreds of companies around the world, including multiple IPOs and unicorns.

Important Disclaimers
This article (the “Article”) is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any investment or any securities. This Article does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to be relied upon as the basis for an investment decision, and is not, and should not be assumed to be, complete. Readers should make their own investigations and evaluations of the information contained herein. The information contained herein does not take into account the particular investment objectives or financial circumstances of any specific person or entity who may receive it. Each reader should consult its own attorney, business adviser and tax adviser as to legal, business, tax and related matters concerning the information contained herein.  Except where otherwise indicated herein, the information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date and will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after the date of preparation. Certain information contained in this Article constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,”  “target,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Readers should not rely on these forward-looking statements.  Certain information reflects subjective determinations which may prove to be incorrect. There can be no assurance that the estimates or projections will be accurate or that historical trends will continue. In considering the prior performance information contained herein, readers should bear in mind past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. All rights reserved. The material may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of PrimeAlpha LLC. 

Copyright © 2020, PrimeAlpha, LLC